11.1 The name of the group\party
11.2 The summary
of RRP goal and my proposed plan to achieve the goal
11.3 Main
difference between RRP and other parties
11.4 My world
view on violence, revolution etc
11.5 Religion of
Democracy and Constitutionalism
11.6 Faith in
Ahimsamurti Mahatma Udham Singh
11.7 Other
books/articles by myself
11.8 Contacts,
Internet communities etc
11.9 How can YOU
help in Prajaa-aadheen Raaja Group?
11.10 Differences
between RRP and all most other intellectuals, leaders
11.11 The most
important difference in campaign method
At
the time of writing this manifesto, my political group is yet unregistered. I
will register a group and a later a political party as well. For registration,
I will keep the name as “Right to Recall Group” and “Right to Recall Party” and
I will keep the official acronyms as RRG\RRP. In common conversation, I will
refer it by following names :
o
Right
to Recall Group\Party
o
Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa
Group\Party
o
Right
to Recall Ministers, Officers, judges Group\Party
o
MRMC-Recall
Group\Party
o
MRCM
Group\Party
The
abbreviations I will use will be RRP, PRRRP, MRCM-Recall and RRMOjG with a lowercase “j”. MRCM stands for “Mineral
Royalties for Commons and Military”, and is my key economic motive to form RRP
and bringing RTR-PM, RTR-CM, RTR-judges, RTR-RBIG laws etc
are my key political motives. The words Ministers, Officers and judges in the
title “Right to Recall Ministers,
Officers, judges Group” are important for me to tell all that how I differ
from those Recallists who insist that Right to Recall
should be confined to MLAs, MPs only and must not be applied on Ministers,
officers, judges. I categorically say that we are not interested in confining
Recall to MLAs and MPs, and I hate all those psuedo-recallists
who insist that Recall should be confined to Panchayats, MPs, MLAs only. They
are all anti-Recall in reality.
“Right to Recall Group” will be a non-election
organization, and will be used to spread information on RTR laws in places
where political groups are banned. And another name I will use is “Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa
Movement”, as unregistered movement. The words “Prajaa-aadheen
Raajaa Movement” will be used to spread the
information on RTR etc where other organizations are
banned.
I
chose the name “Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa
Group aka Right to Recall Party” or MRCM Group or
MRCM-RRP because I want the group to be known for its purpose. The purpose of
PRRRP is to enact TCP, RTR, MRCM etc laws and
establish the Vedic concept of Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa. And so instead of a catchy generic name with catchy
keywords, I chose the name that will reflect core purposes.
The
RRP goal is to get one Gazette Notification issued - nothing more and nothing
less. The proposed Gazette Notification namely TCP-GN described in section-1.3
is the one and only item in RRP goal.
What
plan do I propose to get these laws passed? The plan I propose is :
1. I will send orders
via SMS\emails to PM\CMs to print TCP, RTR-PM etc drafts
in Gazette
2. I will appeal to
Mahatma Udham Singh to order PM\CMs to print these
drafts in Gazette after Mahatma Udham Singh is
convinced that majority of citizens have ordered PM\CMs to print these drafts
in the Gazette
3. I will inform as many
people as possible about TCP, MRCM and RTR drafts using pamphlets,
newspaper-ads and election contesting.
4. I will request every
activist and citizen of India to take actions (1)–(3)
and add actions he likes.
The
details on Ahimsamurti Mahatma Udham
Singh are in chap-13.
Almost
all parties, be new or old, be small or big have same method at core : they insist that citizens must elect their party’s
candidates as MPs first. They say that unless citizens elect them as MPs first,
there is nothing they can do to improve India. And they promise that once
citizens elect them, they will enact laws to improve India, though they don’t
disclose the drafts of those laws.
I
at RRP differ from them. We don’t say that citizens must elect even one of us
to fix India. My request is : if citizens can force
existing PM to print TCP draft in the Gazette, then the citizens of India will
be able to improve India thereafter using TCP draft. This is a major difference
between us and rest – my proposed method doesn’t at all depend on requiring
citizens to elect us.
Further,
no party outlines how they will ensure that their own MPs will not become as
corrupt as existing MPs after they win elections. The other parties only give
empty statements like “see, you must put faith in some people”. I and my
colleagues at RRP differ. We officially claim that we know only one way to
ensure that MPs, Ministers etc from our parties will
be non-corrupt – the citizens will have to force the existing PM to print
TCP-draft and using TCP draft, citizens should enact Right to Recall laws. And
Right to Recall law-draft will ensure that our MPs or other MPs reduce their
corruption.
So RRP’s method to
improve India involves enacting TCP draft as first step, and enacting more laws and then
replace MP, Ministers, IAS, IPS, judges etc if the
need be. Most parties method insist on “elect our
candidates as MPs” alone as their first step. IMO, their method is flawed
because if citizens don’t change laws first, no matter which set of individuals
arrive, the corruption will not decrease.
The action items I
have worked out for RRP is listed in chap-13 of this book. The actions are
clone-positive i.e. if more Right to Recall parties comes in politics and even
if they compete, they will add up, not cut each other. The action items need no
more than 2-4 hours a week from 200,000 activists. So in terms of time, the RRP
method is very efficient.
I
am against using violence against Ministers, officers, judges, policemen and I
am also against using violence against wealthy individuals who own these
Ministers, officers and judges. But if officers, Ministers start imprisoning or
throwing frivolous Income Tax cases, frivolous Sales Tax cases, frivolous
Service Tax cases or frivolous rape cases etc against
“Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa”
activists, then I will re-think my stand on use of violence against Ministers,
officers, judges and particularly the wealthy ones who own the judges,
Ministers etc. But till then I oppose violence and every form of violence.
I
oppose revolution. I strictly believe in evolution i.e. one small change at a
time, which is why each and each of 200 Gazette Notifications I have demanded
is one small change at a time. TCP draft is just 3 lines, MRCM draft is just 4
pages. RTR-PM is just 1 page and so forth.
I
am a devout believer in the Religion of Democracy. I have full and firm faith
in the Constitution as interpreted by We
the People of India. I see no major compelling need to change the
Constitution anymore, though I am not against any demand to amend the
Constitution as long as draft of the Amendment is given in writing. I believe
that Indian State has been overthrown and usurped by not following the
Constitution as interpreted by Citizens and instead imposing the Constitution
as interpreted by the judges. And my aim is restoration of the Indian State by making Constitution as interpreted by us Commons
as the Supreme force in India.
I
dont need modification in Constitution, I only insist
we should interpret the Constitution as it was interpreted by the citizens on
Jan-25-1950. As on Jan-25-1950, there was no Supreme Court as it is today, and
so the only authority to give meanings to the words in the Constitution was the
citizenry of India. Now the citizenry has added the word “Democracy” in
preamble, which on Jan-25-1950 meant – a regime where majority enacts laws and the majority’s interpretation is final.
This has been the definition of Democracy in West since 1200 AD, wherein Jurors
interpretation of law-draft was final. This ideal was re-stated in Maryland
Constitution Art-23 : “In the trial of all criminal cases, the Jury shall be the Judges of Law, as well as of fact, except that
the Court may pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a
conviction. The right of trial by Jury of all issues of fact in civil
proceedings in the several Courts of Law in this State, where the amount in
controversy exceeds the sum of $10,000, shall be inviolably preserved” .
Thus
the meaning of word “Democracy” in Constitution on Jan-25-1951 was -- a regime
where majority enacts laws and the majority’s interpretation is final. We want restoration of the Constitution
with the same meaning.
The
words “Ahimsamurti Mahatma Udham
Singh” means people who are like Ahimsamurti Mahatma Udham Singh.
I
and most f my colleagues at RRP have utmost faith in Ahimsamurti Mahatma Udham Singh
and I believe that all pro-common positive changes, where elitemen
lost, came only because of efforts of Ahimsamurti
Mahatma Udham Singh. Eg
Freedom of India Act , 1946 passed in UK Parliament
because of decades of efforts of Mahatma Udham Singh,
the contribution of Duratma Gandhi and Congress of
below 0.01%. The Gandhians love to insult our icon,
Mahatma Udham Singh. Eg Duratma Gandhi himself said once that Mahatma Udham Singh and Mahatma Madanlal Dhingra were mad persons, and Duratma
Gandhi also said that Mahatma Bhagat Singh etc were misguided youth. But for us, Mahatma Udham Singh is next God.
The
central faith we have is that – if at all PM prints TCP ,
RTR, MRCM etc drafts in printed in Gazette, it would
be due to efforts of Mahatma Udham Singh and no other
reason.
All Party publications are available for free at
http://rahulmehta.com/publications.htm
1. Culture, Political Culture and National Character are not the reasons : This book has an analysis of causes of the problems in
India that no longer exist in West. And book has proofs that culture, religion etc are not the reason. This book, will be available
at rahulmehta.com/331.htm
2. Right to Recall Party Manifesto : Part-2 : Many topics couldn’t be discussed in part-1 (this
book) and I have will discuss in part-2. Part-2 will be available at rahulmehta.com/311.htm
3. Right to Recall Party Manifesto : Part-3 : Many topics couldn’t be discussed in part-1 (this
book) and I have will discuss in part-3. Part-3 will be available at rahulmehta.com/321.pdf
4. Questions on RRP proposals : A list of 1000-2000
multiple choice questions on existing RRP agenda. If a person can answer these
questions, he can assume that he knows RRP agenda. Once RRP has over 1000
members, passing a test from these questions will be the only membership
condition. This book will be available at
rahulmehta.com/341.htm
5. Questions on Indian Administration : A list of 1000-2000
multiple choice questions on existing Indian administration. This book will be
available at http://rahulmehta.com/351.htm
6. Duratma Gandhi : The book is on Mohandas Gandhi aka Duratma
Gandhi, Rashtrapita Ahmisamurti
Mahatma Subhashchandra Bose, Ahmisamurti
Mahatma Udham Singh and other topics in Indian
Freedom Struggle. The book explains why\how Duratma
Gandhi partnered with British to delay freedom struggle of India and how
silence of activists who knew that Duratma Gandhi was
wrong resulted into death and abduction of lakhs of Hindus in Pakistan. And
that British passed Freedom of India Act not due to Duratma
Gandhi and useless fellows of Congress, but due to fear of Ahimsamurti
Mahatma Udham Singh. And how Azad Hind Fauz played most important role in passing of Freedom of
India Act. This book will be available at
http://rahulmehta.com/361.htm
7. Selected topics in World History : This book will be
available at http://rahulmehta.com/371.htm
8. Selected topics in Indian History : This book will be
available at http://rahulmehta.com/381.htm
Following
are the important URLs
1. rahulmehta.com
:
the main website for MRCM-Recall Group
2. http://forum.righttorecall.info
: the main
website to post questions
3. google group
http://groups.google.com/group/RightToRecall
4. http://orkut.co.in/Community.aspx?cmm=21780619
: the orkut community
5. Facebook community : http://www.facebook.com/groups/rrgindia/
6. MehtaRahulC@yahoo.com
is my email address , my mobile number is
+91-98251-27780
The
readers requested to join internet discussion communities such as bharat-rakshak.com , india-forum.com and “Indian Politics”
community on orkut. We request readers to campaign
without spamming on all internet communities for RRP laws.
Pls order PM via SMS to
print RTR-PM, TCP and other drafts the Gazette. Please also see chap-13 of this
book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several
steps where-in you can spend 4 hours a week and help RRP aka Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa Group bring
Right to Recall law-drafts in India.
We radically differ from most parties and most
intellectuals. Following are main differences
|
What we at
RRP say |
What other parties’
MPs and the eminent intellectuals of
India say |
|
1. Ownership of mineral mines and the Govt plots |
|
|
RRP insists that we
Indians (we citizens) and not the State of India own the mines and Govt plots. And so we insist that we citizens and our
Military should get all the rents and royalties. To be specific, RRP
firmly believes citizens must get rents from GoI
plots such as IIMA plot, JNU plot, airport plots etc |
The leaders of
Congress, BJP, CPM and all eminent intellectuals of India have firmly said
that the mineral mines and Govt plots are the
property of “State” of India and common Indians shall have no ownership,
control over them. And they have categorically refused to give rents to
Indians (citizens) over IIMA, JNU and airport plots. |
|
2. We are Democracyists , MPs of
other parties and eminent intellectuals of India are fascists |
|
|
We at RRP are the
only ones in political arena who insist that we commons MUST have legislative
powers and we commons MUST have powers to expel and replace officers/judges.
IOW, we are Democracyists |
All other parties
and all eminent intellectuals of India consider us commons and voters as
fools, and insist that we commons should have no say in law-making and
appointments/replacements of officers, policemen, judges. And we commons
should have no say in taking judgments in the courts. India’s most intellectuals have fascists mentality and so they
firmly insist that all discretion in administration should be with Ministers,
IAS, IPS, judges and intellectuals only. Forget discretionary powers, so
fascists are Indian intellectuals that they even oppose TCP – merely letting
citizens post complaints on PM’s website. We abhor their fascism, and they
abhor over Democracyism. |
|
3. Citizens’ interpretation of Constitution
shall be final ; SCjs’
interpretation shall not be final |
|
|
We are the only group in India who believe that India’s Constitution as interpreted by us
Citizens of India shall be the final voice, and the Constitution’s
interpretation by the two dozen Supreme Court judges may be important but not
final. We agree that
Supreme Court judges’ interpretation is above the
interpretation of Ministers, and is indeed important for Citizens to take
note of. But it is not final. Our Constitution itself in the Preamble clearly
says that India shall be a Democracy and a Republic which clearly supports
the “Citizens’ Review System” which states that the Constitution as
interpreted by Citizens is final and it is above the Judocratic
Review. Which is why we insist on Jury System from lower to Supreme
Court, and demand citizens Review System wherein citizens can register YES on
validity of SCjs’ judgments. IOW, we believe in
Constitutional Democracy. |
All other parties’ MPs and all eminent intellectuals
of India have always opposed to the Citizens’ Review System and also opposed
the Jury System. They have always
supported the judge system and the judocratic
review. While all other parties and all intellectuals insist that
Constitution as interpreted by the two dozen Supreme Court judges as final
and us common’s interpretation is some garbage. All parties and intellectuals
insist that us Citizens’ interpretation of Constitution should be ignored,
and our YES/NO on SCjs’ judgments should not be
even taken. And all intellectuals insist the interpretation of SCjs should be mercilessly and ruthlessly imposed over
the commons using media, education and Police and Military if the need be.
IOW, other parties and intellectuals believe in Constitutional judocratic Fascism. |
|
4. Disclosing drafts of GNs (Gazette
Notifications) and GOs (Govt Orders
, Ordinances) |
|
|
We are the first
and only group in India, who show the drafts of GNs we
demand. We do not ask people to put faith in us. We request people to
read our GNs and decide on their own if these GNs are something they would
support. That way a citizen voter shall have full opportunity to decide
whether he should support us or oppose us. |
Every group makes
policy promises, but each party’s MPs and MLAs refuse to publish the drafts
of the GOs they would pass. Their answer is “you vote for us first and we
will show you the drafts after we become Ministers”. Well, Mr. Candidate,
what if the drafts turn out be useless and against the well
being of us commons? Their answer is “Have faith in me”. We dont give us such obscure and vague answers |
|
5. On the myth of the ‘Political Culture’ |
|
|
The problems of
India are due to bad law-drafts that intellectuals and other Party’s MPs have
enacted. Nothing is wrong with the culture of us commons. |
The eminent
intellectuals have created a myth of political culture and claim that
problems of India are due to this culture of us common Indians and not due to
flawed laws they support. |
|
6. Other parties’
are to win elections, collect bribes ; we are ONLY
to enact laws we demand |
|
|
Our primary goal is
to get some Gazette Notifications printed and NOT winning the elections. We
are contesting only to give publicity to GN drafts we have proposed. We do
not insist that voters vote for us - we insist that citizens force their CMs, PM, MLAs
and MPs to enact laws we are proposing. And we ask voters to vote for us only
if they are convinced that the leaders of other group shall not print these Govt Orders. |
Every other party,
their main goal is to win elections and they are not committed to any change
in administration. |
|
7. Reducing corruption, nepotism in courts |
|
|
We are the only
group who speaks against nepotism in courts. |
All other group
leaders and intellectuals have been supporting nepotism in courts by
supporting the laws (such as interview system and judge system) that promote
nepotism in courts. And they have opposed laws like Jury System and abolition
of interviews which are must to put an end to nepotism in the courts. |
|
8. Respect for
commons |
|
|
We have utmost
respect for commons, and insist that his YES/NO on legal administrative
issues should be registered and given weight |
The other Parties’
leaders and all intellectuals of India have nothing but insults for us
commons. They consider us commons as “immature” (read :
idiot, moron etc) and so insist that us commons’
YES/NO on laws, judgments, appointments etc should
not be even registered forget giving any weightage. |
|
9. Against
donations |
|
|
We are against
donations. We believe that activists must allocate time, and may spend money
on xeroxes, newspaper advertisements etc but should send no money to top. |
All parties ask
workers to gather donations. And by giving donations, the donors are only
spoiling the parties and worsening political scene in India. |
|
10. Some 100-120 more differences |
|
|
And there are about
120 differences. So many? Yes, so
many, and many more. We have proposed about over 120 Govt
Orders to bring changes in administration. To see these differences, please
see the list of Govt Orders we demand and promise
on http://www.rahulmehta.com/all_drafts.htm . |
And the other
parties and all intellectuals of India oppose each one and every one of them.
And thus there are about 120 differences between MRCM party and other
parties’ MPs and all intellectuals of India. |
|
11. Approach with other Party’s volunteers |
|
|
The leaders of
other parties always ask activists to leave other parties and join their own
parties. |
Whereas, I and
other volunteers at RRP never ask activists of other parties, NGOs to leave
their parties, NGOs. Instead we request them – “can you convince your leaders
to add Right to Recall PM, RTR CM, RTR Supreme Court judges etc drafts in your Manifesto? My goal is to convert as
many political parties as possible into RRP clones by injecting RTR, TCP etc drafts in their manifesto by influencing their own
workers. |
There
are at least 100+ more differences. The 11th difference cited above
shows a fundamental difference in method as well as motive. The leaders of
other parties always ask activists to leave other parties and join their own
parties, because these leaders want to become center of power. Whereas, I and
my other volunteers at Right to Recall Party never ever ask activists of other
parties, NGOs to leave their parties, NGOs. Instead we request them – “can you
convince your leaders to add Right to Recall PM, RTR CM, RTR Supreme Court
judges etc drafts in your Manifesto”?
And
I openly insist that I would be happier if activists form one more different
competing RRP or continue to force their leaders to add TCP
, RTR, MRCM drafts in their organization’s agenda !! Why? Why do I ask a
non-80G-activists to form a competing Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa Party? Or why do I ask them to add RTR drafts in
their organization’s agenda? Because instead of one Right to Recall Party
campaigning for TCP draft, MRCM draft and RTR drafts, I would prefer to have
100 Right to Recall Partys each asking for MRCM
draft, RTR draft etc. Now if 100 Right to Recall Partys
demand RTR drafts and unleash a extremely competitive
politics for RTR drafts, then all Right to Recall Partys
may lose elections due to division in votes. But information on RTR drafts
would spread amongst maximal number of citizens of India at fastest possible
speed. Also, if there are 100 organizations demanding RTR drafts, it will be
more difficult for opponents to finish the demand for RTR drafts. As I said
several times, my goal is not to
win elections --- my goal is to get the TCP drafts, RTR drafts passed.
And so 100 RRPs and organizations each demanding RTR draft will do better than
one RRP demanding RTR draft. And so I am happy when a true activist doesn’t
join me, but he starts one more RRP or tries to add RTR drafts in the agenda of
his organization.
Review questions
1. Whose interpretation
of Constitution is final in our RRP views? Whose interpretation of Constitution
is final in the intellectuals’ views?
2. Do intellectuals
consider minerals as the property of us commons? Do intellectuals consider GoI plots such as Delhi airport or IIMA plot as the
property of us commons?
3. Does RRP believe in “Political
Culture” theory?
Exercises
1. Please obtain draft
of law Shourie or other BJP MPs or any other MP proposed in Parliament
to enact National ID system.
2. Please obtain draft
of law that the MPs of CPM, BJP, Congress etc
proposed in the Parliament to reduce the nepotism in Supreme, High and Lower
courts
3. Please obtain draft
of law Congress, BJP and CPM MPs proposed in Parliament to recall MPs, MLAs, CMs, PM
etc.
4. Please obtain draft
of law that Jayprakash Nayaran
proposed to recall MPs,
MLAs, CMs, PM etc.